VATP.IO research

Virtual assets trading platforms now resemble capital markets infrastructure more than casual swap sites. The range of venues spans retail apps, institutional VATPs regulated by the SFC, and …

Listing governance is one of the clearest signals regulators and institutions look for when evaluating a VATP. A disciplined committee process reduces legal risk, protects clients, and supports market …

Regulated VATPs have to prove they can withstand outages and security events without harming clients or markets. An incident response runbook gives teams a repeatable playbook and evidence that …

Institutional users will not wait through vague onboarding flows. A VATP stack has to make connectivity, verification, and production cutover predictable while satisfying regulators. That requires an …

Virtual asset trading platforms share a vocabulary that blends market structure, technology, and regulation. This glossary captures the essential terms a VATP team or partner needs when designing a …

Licensed VATP exchanges are not simply compliant versions of the platforms that came before them. The license reflects an operating model where supervision, custody quality, and market integrity shape …

Asia’s virtual asset landscape is diverse. Hong Kong, Singapore, the UAE, and other jurisdictions are shaping different versions of regulated trading venues. VATP operators that plan to serve …

Hong Kong’s VATP regime defines how regulated virtual asset trading platforms should operate. Any team planning to launch or partner with a Hong Kong VATP needs to map product design, …

VATP virtual asset trading platforms now compete on controls as much as on liquidity. Regulators expect evidence that client assets are segregated, market integrity is monitored, and technology risk …

Virtual asset trading platforms sit at the center of tokenization. They list, price, and settle everything from coins and stablecoins to tokenized domains and real world assets. The shift from lightly …