Virtual assets trading platforms now resemble capital markets infrastructure more than casual swap sites. The range of venues spans retail apps, institutional VATPs regulated by …
Listing governance is one of the clearest signals regulators and institutions look for when evaluating a VATP. A disciplined committee process reduces legal risk, protects clients, …
Regulated VATPs have to prove they can withstand outages and security events without harming clients or markets. An incident response runbook gives teams a repeatable playbook and …
Institutional users will not wait through vague onboarding flows. A VATP stack has to make connectivity, verification, and production cutover predictable while satisfying …
Virtual asset trading platforms share a vocabulary that blends market structure, technology, and regulation. This glossary captures the essential terms a VATP team or partner needs …
Licensed VATP exchanges are not simply compliant versions of the platforms that came before them. The license reflects an operating model where supervision, custody quality, and …
Asia’s virtual asset landscape is diverse. Hong Kong, Singapore, the UAE, and other jurisdictions are shaping different versions of regulated trading venues. VATP operators …
Hong Kong’s VATP regime defines how regulated virtual asset trading platforms should operate. Any team planning to launch or partner with a Hong Kong VATP needs to map …
VATP virtual asset trading platforms now compete on controls as much as on liquidity. Regulators expect evidence that client assets are segregated, market integrity is monitored, …
Virtual asset trading platforms sit at the center of tokenization. They list, price, and settle everything from coins and stablecoins to tokenized domains and real world assets. …